The Disconnect between current Capitalism and Free Enterprise

I am a serial entrepreneur who believes that the free enterprise system is the best alternative for creating upward mobility, a growing middle class, the most efficient allocation of resources and the least costly production of goods and services to the benefit of society as a whole. But free enterprise is based on the principal of a free and open market. Theoretically the ease of communication today should create more opportunity and much greater competition. Free enterprise does not thrive in a monopoly or oligopoly both of which limit competition but in many cases that is what we now have. As a result the middle class in the west is in serious danger of backsliding into the poor class from which it came over the past hundred plus years.

Branding and Brand power are the main tools that are limiting competion, allowing capital to seize a much larger portion of the pie at the expense of labour creating the status of superrich and the growing disparity in the distribution of wealth. These are serious dangers because market control interferes with free enterprise and skews the results. Yes it is still possible to create a new brand but increasingly large organizations block the market and take advantage by acquiring up and coming companies and only then allowing them full market penetration.

On an individual basis it is now critical to become an entrepreneur allowing for self-determination and upward mobility that is in decline for employees. The most important skill anyone can learn today is the ability to create and manage your career. The problem is much bigger for society. We have created a society in the west with very high expectations and a philosophy of entitlement. A large percentage of the population will not put forward the effort and level of determination required to succeed as an entrepreneur – not without first experiencing serious pain and a major economic correction. We are vulnerable but collectively we remain in a state of denial.

The capitalist system which allowed the middle class to flourish in the west is broken. Rather than continuing to create opportunity it has begun to limit it. Rather than spreading the success to the developing world we are in danger of returning to a more rigid class system with the superrich having a disproportionate amount of economic power. Solutions are impossible as long as we remain in a state of denial compounded by governments which have become dysfunctional. A good start could come from consumers by becoming better informed and breaking the power of the brands. This should be happening through social media but it isn’t. Instead brand control of the market is being re-enforced by social media marketing.

I am very concerned that I have lived and worked in an era that has been optimum for the individual but is no longer sustainable. I am very concerned that my grandchildren will be denied the opportunity that my generation has enjoyed. One of the great challenges of capitalism is to moderate the influence of greed. If we don’t find a way to level the playing field it’s difficult to predict how social unrest will manifest itself in a society where expectations cannot be achieved.

Similar Posts

  • 3 Signs Your Startup May Be Slipping

    Originally posted by Emily Barnes, The Creative Destruction Lab The Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto

    Businesses large and small can find it tough to spare a few moments to step back and look at the big picture. But immersed in the little details surrounding new product features and releases, you can easily miss a few telltale signs your startup is starting to spiral.

    Luckily, Fred Dawkins has done the legwork for you. Partner of the Creative Destruction Lab, serial entrepreneur and founder of The Old Hide House, Dawkins has turned his past experiences into a series of books about entrepreneurship, the first of which is Everyday Entrepreneur. He recently hosted a number of workshops in partnership with the Lab, touching on everything from the misconceptions of entrepreneurship, to the day-to-day trials and tribulations of an entrepreneur, to the increasingly important role of small business in the global economy and all that’s in between.

    If you can’t spare the few minutes to check in on that big picture, Dawkins asks that you at least watch for these three signs that your startup is on the out.

    YOUR STARTUP BECOMES YOUR LIFE.

    Undoubtedly, there’ll be an imbalance. There’s no denying that you’ll have to work long hours – especially in the startup phase and when you run into times of hardship.  Your social life will at times suffer, as will your relationships. But this anguish shouldn’t be a constant.

    This may seem erroneous if you’re in the early stage of running a business. Timing is everything, and if you launch too late – especially in tech – it can make or break your success. It’s a bit of a catch-22. But unless you’re an anomaly, if you’re working an innumerous amount of hours, you’re doing something wrong. It’s symptomatic, and signals a discord elsewhere in your business. How strong is your team? Are you delegating?

    Despite much popular literature that speaks to the contrary, you truly can maintain work-life balance as an entrepreneur.  Recharging your batteries is critical. Have your hobbies and have your venture. Sometimes the two will overlap. Even then, you must create that separation. When you lose sight of work-life balance, you also risk impairing your business’ vision. It’s important to step away from your company, if only for a few hours.

    CASH FLOW – IT NEVER LIES!

    If you’re going to be successful, you’ll first need to know and understand your numbers. Metrics aside, look to cash flow. It’s right on your doorstep. Omnipresent, it serves as the perfect warning mechanism. If you’re running low on cash, you’re doing something wrong.

    Too often, startups seem to bolt at the first sign of cash flow struggles, looking to investment for relief. Granted, it’s a quick and relatively easy fix (provided you can offer up a good pitch), but too many run into the open arms of deals that offer marginal amounts of cash for large chunks of equity.  It’s easy enough to relinquish control of your business because you have to – to bring in a partner or some easy money. But don’t make rash decisions without properly considering the long-term consequences. Do the math. Beware of commitments that’ll eat up your profits. Brick and mortar businesses tackle high overhead, hardware startups combat production costs, and SAAS businesses at first operate virtually cost-free. Remind yourself of this. In a startup press bubble that’s dominated by one funding announcement after another, it’s all too easy to start asking for money. Don’t forget about sales, the good ol’ fashioned revenue stream.

    There’s a lot to be said for natural growth and learning to manage within your means. Bootstrapping isn’t a requirement so much as an opt-in measure of control.

    YOU, THE FOUNDER, ARE THE BEST PERSON ON YOUR TEAM.

    Things are different when you transition from project to business. Parameters change, and your skillsets need to adapt along with them. But few people have the knowledge or experience necessary to carry an idea through to company, then onto global success. Don’t be afraid to hire people who know more than you do in specific areas.

    You’ll be tempted to keep a short leash on success, and find it difficult to relinquish control of even the most minor of tasks. Don’t impede success for the sake of ego. Sometimes you’ll need to let go of responsibility, and sometimes that also means you’ll need to cut off a slice of the equity pie. Your ego will take a hit, and your percentage of future earnings will too, but you’ll mend and the pie may just get bigger.

    Recognize your deficiencies. You can’t always keep pace with your company, or grow at the same rate it does – not everyone is that malleable. Hire those whose skillsets can compensate for the holes in your own. You are not your company and at some point your interests may diverge, so have an end game.

  • |

    Creative Destruction vs Trump’s Destructive Reduction.

    Creative Destruction was a term first popularised by economist Joseph Schumpeter. The premise is that innovation and technology will ensure progress on the basis of replacing old industries, markets and economic structures with new more efficient concepts. The architects who accomplish this are entrepreneurs who think outside the box, question existing systems and introduce new ways and means. Never has this been more relevant with the impending impact of AI putting us on the cusp of what many believe will be a major revolution. Some believe it will bring about comparable change to that fostered by the Industrial Revolution. Regardless this change will be led by the key leaders that Schumpeter relied upon: entrepreneurs and tech genii.

    Enter Donald Trump, certainly a disrupter but only in a literal sense. The proverbial bull in the China shop. The antithesis of the dynamic innovators that Schumpeter championed. A man apparently stuck in the past. A strong proponent of returning to the ‘good old days’ of the 1890’s, his model for what the U.S. should be. Let’s call that ‘Destructive Reduction.’

    Subtraction by reduction. Attacking allies. Breaking trade agreements. Withdrawing from international organisations. Renouncing treaties. Axing social benefits. Deporting immigrants. Recklessly slashing jobs within the bureaucracy. Reductions without analysis in an ill-fated attempt reduce the national debt, offset quickly by tax cuts in his ‘Big Beautiful Bill’. The man hates complexity. Give him a one pager and a burger and he’s ready to act. Rationality be damned. Right to a fault? ON and ON Don!

    Admittedly AI may help him with the odd element in this quixotic attack on well, just about everything. Forgotten is that the firm foundation of growth for the past hundred years for the U.S. has been research and development. For the past fifty years and more the U.S. has spent roughly 40% of the amount spent on R & D across the entire world. It’s been a proven formula for wealth creation and economic success. So what does the Big D do? He cuts the funding for leading research institutions like Harvard. This is perverse logic but then logic had been abandoned in a flurry of executive orders with the size of the signature rivalling that of John Hancock.

    I wonder who will fill the many voids created by this executioner of trust? Trump’s drift toward isolationism, based on groundless economics, creates great opportunity for none other than China. A country that quietly invests in areas that the U.S. largely chooses to ignore like Africa and South America. Areas that have been insulted by the Big D. Projections show that by 2100 there will be twelve billion people on Earth. Nine billion of those will reside in Africa or Asia. Every continent but Africa will be facing ageing populations. China has a plan. It has a much longer window than anything America conceives. China will quietly encourage the decline of the American Empire, if you can call it one. Donald has given their plan a nice boost.

    The world is changing. Are we ready? These are the questions that make my novel The Noah Project a wake up call to action.

  • Why Branding is a threat to the middle class

    In theory as Globalization evolves resources will be allocated in the most efficient way possible ensuring that goods will be produced on the lowest cost basis to the benefit of all. In a perfect global system labour will shift around until the transition is complete and the rewards for labour will equalize around the global network. During the transition while wage rates in higher earning countries are frozen or rise slowly as wage rates in other areas catch up, those living in the higher wage countries will benefit from low cost goods during the transition. All of this takes place without impediments or barriers to free and open competition. Entrepreneurs will drive the progress by ferreting out opportunities across the global system.

    In practice as we continue to embrace such a global system, the rewards to labour in the low wage countries are lagging while much of the benefit of low cost goods are not reaching the consumer. Instead the rich are becoming the super rich while the middle class is facing the reality of returning to an historical norm with relative rewards well below those achieved in the west for the past sixty years during which consumerism has flourished. In an evolving era of Big Data where the status quo is becoming a moving target while character traits such as adaptability and resilience are becoming more critical, the business behemoths of the world are getting richer by controlling markets. Much of this control stems from branding and creating the allusion that branded goods are inherently superior. At the same time effective marketing has mislead us that these behemoths are so critical that they are ‘too Big to Fail’. Branding has effectively created near monopolies effectively providing barriers to entry for aspiring entrepreneurs in the process by limiting their upside and increasing their challenges

    Mammoth organizations operating on ten year plans are not appropriate for our fast paced Global economy. However control over markets allows them to achieve innovation and flexibility through outsourcing and acquisition. Oh these in themselves do create upside for entrepreneurs who can launch a startup and find an eager buyer for their initial success. However the odds against success are greater and fewer of us are likely to get there. It is certainly possible for a limited few to build new brands creating new members of the super rich club. However overall we have abandoned core economic principles such as the Law of Diminishing Returns and the Optimum Size of the firm in favour of uninformed consumerism and market control through brands owned and managed by what are effectively huge bureaucracies. Is there a tipping point ahead? Surely social media and instant communication are a threat to the dominance of brands – OR are they just additional instruments of control?

    Globalization has brought large numbers into the global work force, increasing the supply of labour. Technology through robotics and mechanization is reducing the demand for labour. Together these factors create downward pressure on wage rates. Upward mobility for the individual is in decline. Capital is securing the lion’s share of the rewards. Job stability is one of the status quos that is disappearing. For all of these reasons the individual must become his or her own brand. The most important skill you can learn today is the ability to create and manage your career.

  • FAST and FURIOUS- The accelerator converting innovation to entrepreneurship

    Indisputable: We live in a global work space – an economy where timing is everything and competition comes from every which direction, blindsiding us, especially where Tech is concerned. There is tremendous pressure to be first out to fill a market niche and tremendous pressure on innovators around the world to become instant entrepreneurs OR to give up the lion’s share of the economic benefit of their innovation to others who can get them to market in a hurry.

    If there is a lesson from the Blackberry debacle it’s that being first gives you a head start but the pack quickly turns to finding ways to do it different and better. There is no time to rest on your laurels. Your advantage is short lived- even much less than ten years ago when Blackberry was first riding high.

    Are the expectations of the market achievable or are we simply seeing a new reality where companies come and go with a greatly reduced life expectancy. Apple did fail once. How much longer will it stay at the top this time?

    When you visit an incubator/accelerator you will often see tired young people committed to a 24/7 work ethic, working in small space shared with other start-ups focused on perfecting their innovation with little understanding of the fundamentals required to operate a business or build a foundation for a company that can last. Did Blackberry ever establish that foundation? After all it was always in a dynamic state of rapid change initially positive but for the past three years negative.

    Can humans really continue to cope with the rate of change that technology allows? Are we being forced to abandon stability in favour of short term success? Overall we find ourselves in an integrated global economy, still wrestling with the ongoing effects of the Great Recession, managed by leaders who are challenged at best, incompetent at worst, where the only sure thing is uncertainty.

    For all of these reasons becoming an entrepreneur is an important option. The economic world will place increasing value on resilience and adaptability. In the face of instability and uncertainty the most important skill we may develop will be the ability to create our own job. Big will not be better. Small and flexible will become the key to individual success.

  • Ontario Government Moves to Strengthen Business Climate

    Generally anything that makes government facilitate as opposed to over regulate is a positive step. The government of Ontario has just announced initiatives that could reduce red tape for businesses and create cluster developments to help drive regional economic growth and create jobs. Will these reforms ever see the light of day in a minority legislature flirting with an election or are they just pre-election temptations to attract votes away from the conservatives?

    Regardless both of these ideas focus on critical areas in the face of a fast paced global economy where all countries are fighting for talent and for markets. Governments at all levels need to become more efficient and more effective. Over regulation serves no purpose other than to increase the cost of government and limit the competitiveness of the private sector, discouraging investment in the province in the process. There is a place for regulation and there are important roles for government but the former needs to be reeled in while the latter needs to be more selective. One preferred area should be to co-operate with the private sector and academia to create ecosystems that foster business opportunities in a variety of areas where we can build comparative advantages. This is now a stated goal for Ontario.

    The most startling evidence of cluster development is Silicon Valley where 350,000 Canadians live and work. That’s right 1% of our population and a much higher percentage of our intellectual capital are resident in northern California. The Valley offers the most dominant ecosystem for an industry that exists, nurturing tech startups and venture capital investment at a phenomenal rate. It is not one that can easily be replicated and it’s been underway for over sixty years.

    In other words this project requires genuine commitment from all concerned. We can only hope that the Ontario government follows through and that the Feds add a level of support. We are in a new era dominated by change. The culture of government and business alike has to change. Government must move away from a culture of bureaucracy that has become an unbearable burden. Big business must move away from a culture of control to a culture of empowerment as change dictates that the status quo is short lived.

    These new initiatives serve as a reality check that we must become more competitive. Government can not be the agent of change that makes this happen but it can facilitate a co-ordinated approach by reducing the costs of doing business and helping to create ecosystems that support the efforts of the private sector. Let’s hope that all parties rally in support of these programs that will create jobs and point us toward a better future.

  • Why Entrepreneurship is critical on a microeconomic level

    Not long ago countries like Japan and Korea focused on a corporate policy based on loyalty. The concept was that employees stayed with a company for their working life. Companies nurtured this loyalty as a solid foundation to build on. North American companies flirted with this concept looking for ways to understand and replicate the quality assurance programs coming out of their Asian competitors. Enter globalization, the technology revolution and a rate of change that may be unsustainable for humans. In a blink job stability vanished.

    Large companies by nature are slower to react than their smaller compatriots but large scale permanent lay-offs have become a fixture of the corporate world. International companies are making record profits pursuing low labour costs around the world while paying those at the top record bonuses. Add the increasing wealth gap and a shrinking middle class in the developed world to the equation and you reveal a growing underpaid work force plagued by uncertainty.

    The result is that the most important skill you can develop today is the ability to create and manage your own career. The key to upward mobility is becoming entrepreneurial at any level. Technology is the greatest ally of the would be entrepreneur. It is less expensive to start a business today. Social networking provides an instant support group. Crowdfunding offers a potential source of funds. New careers are being created every year while traditional roles disappear. Entrepreneurs are the problem solvers that create these new opportunities.

    The best news: after you’ve done this once; after you made the initial leap of faith and become an entrepreneur, you can and will repeat the process again and again. Change is the one constant we can expect in our lives going forward. Change is the antithesis of stability. Seniors are doing startups out of necessity. Youth are doing startups to get into the work force. Mompreneurs are dealing with the difficulty of re-entering the workforce by creating new careers that encompass their lifestyle needs.Every startup has a multiplier effect through job creation. So the answer for a secure future no longer lies with embracing a career with one strong entity. A secure future can best be secured through the ability to adapt and recreate yourself according to new circumstances. The essence of entrepreneurship is adaptability and resilience – the ability and determination to face new circumstances. We are entering a new era of entrepreneurship.

Leave a Reply